Assessing the cooling/lubricating agencies for sustainable alternatives during machining of Nimonic 80: Economic and environmental impacts

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSarikaya, Murat/0000-0001-6100-0731
dc.contributor.authorMakhesana, Mayur A.
dc.contributor.authorVesuwala, Harsh
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Kaushik M.
dc.contributor.authorVafadar, Ana
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Navneet
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-23T19:41:39Z
dc.date.available2025-03-23T19:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentSinop Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractDeveloping sustainable manufacturing methods that balance environmental and economic aspects is challenging. A comprehensive analysis of the economics of machining and carbon emissions is essential to encourage adopting sustainable practices. This work presents the machinability and comparative sustainability analysis of Nimonic 80 superalloy when it is machined utilizing a novel, environmentally friendly vegetable oil-based hybrid nanofluidminimum quantity lubrication (MQL) and liquid carbon dioxide (LCO2) technique. The main objective is to comprehend the efficacy of the proposed approach on tool life, surface roughness, power consumption, total machining costs, and carbon emissions. Compared to other machining conditions, the use of hybrid nanofluid-MQL under 100 m/min cutting speed prevented rapid flank wear and considerably increased tool life by about 17-59 %. The change in cutting speed from 100 to 150 m/min has resulted in reduced tool life about 13-42 % under the selected environments. In addition, when compared to dry, flood, and MQL machining, the use of hybrid nanofluid-MQL and LCO2 reduced surface roughness by around 16-45 % at 150 m/min. Sustainability analysis revealed that machining at 150 m/min resulted in decreased costs ranging from 6.1 % to 36.4 % for selected cutting environments. Applying hybrid nanofluid-MQL lowered carbon emissions by 16.83 %, whereas LCO2 reduced carbon emissions by 14.6 % at 100 m/min. At 150 m/min, hybrid nanofluid-MQL and LCO2 lowered carbon emission by 22.3 % and 21.5 % at 150 m/min compared to dry machining. Compared to alternative cutting environments, hybrid nanofluid-MQL and LCO2 applications have longer tool lives, lower machining costs, and carbon emissions. As a result, they are economical and environmentally friendly.
dc.description.sponsorshipNirma University
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the resources and financial support provided by Nirma University. The sustainability assessment of the experiments was carried out at the Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory at the Institute of Infrastructure Technology Research and Management, India, and the authors are grateful to both the institutes and labs.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29238
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid38638978
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190133472
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29238
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11486/6605
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001235986900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCell Press
dc.relation.ispartofHeliyon
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250323
dc.subjectMachining
dc.subjectNimonic 80
dc.subjectVegetable oil
dc.subjectHybrid nanofluid-MQL
dc.subjectLCO2
dc.subjectSustainability analysis
dc.subjectMachining costs
dc.subjectCarbon emissions
dc.titleAssessing the cooling/lubricating agencies for sustainable alternatives during machining of Nimonic 80: Economic and environmental impacts
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu