IDENTIFYING QUALITY CRITERIA OF A SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ADOPTED BY ACADEMIC COMMUNITY: A CASE STUDY
[ X ]
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
This study aims to provide a realistic viewpoint based on academicians’ views about what thequality of scientific publication means and to provide criteria / recommendations for determiningthe quality of a scientific research. From qualitative research methods, case study has beenpreferred in this study which allows comprehending an event or situation in detail. Frompurposeful sampling techniques, criterion sampling has been used for selection of participants.Participants involve 22 academicians who work at a higher education institution and take academicincentive payment. 22 percent of participants (n=5) include research assistants, 22 percent (n=5)assistant professors; 31 percent (n=7) associate professors; and 27 percent (n=6) professors. Semistructured interview form has been used for collecting qualitative data. When themes and codesare analyzed which appear as a result of study, it is observed that academicians regard thefollowing criteria as an indicator of quality in a research: “Appropriateness of Abstract” theme;“Contribution to Literature” theme, “Originality” theme, “Identification of Scope and Focus”theme, “Scientific” theme, “Comprehensiveness” theme, “Reporting” theme, “Ethic” theme. Therecomes out 8 themes and 28 codes within the category of research quality criteria adopted byacademicians.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Kaynak
Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
10
Sayı
36
