A comparative study of 3D printing and sol-gel polymer production techniques: A case study on usage of ABS polymer for radiation shielding
dc.authorid | Gultekin, Batuhan/0000-0002-0046-1830 | |
dc.authorid | Ogul, Hasan/0000-0002-5121-2893 | |
dc.authorid | BULUT, Fatih/0000-0001-5335-2307 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ogul, Hasan | |
dc.contributor.author | Gultekin, Batuhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Bulut, Fatih | |
dc.contributor.author | Us, Hakan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-23T19:39:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-23T19:39:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.department | Sinop Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | This study focuses on the comparative analysis of ABS polymer samples produced using two distinct manufacturing techniques: 3D printing and the sol -gel methods. In the first approach, ABS polymer was augmented with rare earth oxides, Er 2 O 3 and Gd 2 O 3 , in nano powder form and fabricated into test specimens using 3D printing technology. In the second approach, identical samples were prepared via the sol -gel technique involving mold-based fabrication. Elemental content analysis revealed no significant differences between the samples produced by the two methods. The study proceeds to evaluate the gamma-ray shielding, neutron shielding, temperature resistance, and SEM/EDS pictures of ABS samples generated through both techniques. 3D printing method exhibited more favorable results in terms of structure morphology and thermal stability while there is no significant difference for radiation shielding. The results provide insights into the performance and suitability of each production method for radiation shielding applications. This research not only contributes to enhancing radiation shielding technology but also informs the selection of the most appropriate fabrication method for specific applications in nuclear technologies and diagnostic energy range in medical purposes. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [1002-A, 122M736] | |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 1002-A Grant No 122M736.r Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) 1002-A Grant No 122M736. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.net.2024.01.001 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1949 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1738-5733 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85182566299 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1943 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2024.01.001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11486/6286 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 56 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001249313300001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Korean Nuclear Soc | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Nuclear Engineering and Technology | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20250323 | |
dc.subject | 3D printer | |
dc.subject | Sol -gel | |
dc.subject | Radiation shielding | |
dc.subject | ABS polymer | |
dc.subject | Rare earth oxides | |
dc.title | A comparative study of 3D printing and sol-gel polymer production techniques: A case study on usage of ABS polymer for radiation shielding | |
dc.type | Article |