Machinability analysis of nickel-based superalloy Nimonic 90: a comparison between wet and LCO2 as a cryogenic coolant

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridPatel, Tej/0000-0001-9779-9813
dc.authoridYadav, Sahitya/0000-0001-5603-9543
dc.authoridGupta, Munish/0000-0002-0777-1559
dc.authoridSarikaya, Murat/0000-0001-6100-0731
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Tej
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Navneet
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Sahitya
dc.contributor.authorShah, Prassan
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Murat
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Dilpreet
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Munish Kumar
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-23T19:44:42Z
dc.date.available2025-03-23T19:44:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentSinop Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe usage of cryogenic fluid is increasing in the machining industries especially to cut the materials having a lower machinability like Nimonic 90, a nickel-based alloy. However, the comparison of flood coolant and LCO2 as a cryogenic fluid based on machining performance has not been found for machining Nimonic 90. In this regard, this study compares LCO2 and conventional mineral oil-based flood coolant on the basis of machining performance while turning Nimonic 90. The effect of turning process parameters (cutting speed (v(c)), feed (f), and depth of cut (a(p))) and cutting fluids has been identified by analyzing machinability indicators like cutting force, flank tool wear, power consumption, surface roughness in terms of R-a, and chip morphology. Increment of 34%, 25%, and 24% in cutting forces has been observed for cryogenic turning using LCO2 in comparison with wet machining when the values of a(p) are 0.75, 0.50, and 0.25 mm, respectively. A decrement of 63% tool wear has been seen in LCO2 cryogenic fluid in contrast to wet machining at higher values of v(c), f, and a(p). The superior surface finish has been found in wet machining, while lesser power consumption was recorded for LCO2 as a cutting fluid. Cryogenic machining provided better chip breakability in comparison with wet machining.
dc.description.sponsorshipSERB-DST, Government of India [ECR/2016/000735]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the SERB-DST, Government of India, for the financial support given under the Project (ECR/2016/000735), titled Design and Development of Energy Efficient Cryogenic Machining Facility for Heat Resistant Alloys and Carbon Fibre Composites.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00170-021-06793-1
dc.identifier.endpage3628
dc.identifier.issn0268-3768
dc.identifier.issn1433-3015
dc.identifier.issue11-12
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102301991
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage3613
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06793-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11486/7000
dc.identifier.volume113
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000625913800002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250323
dc.subjectNickel-based superalloy
dc.subjectCryogenic machining
dc.subjectMachinability indicators
dc.subjectWet machining
dc.titleMachinability analysis of nickel-based superalloy Nimonic 90: a comparison between wet and LCO2 as a cryogenic coolant
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu