WALTER T. STACE VE STEVEN T. KATZ'A ÖZEL BIR REFERANSLA MISTIK TECRÜBENIN MAHIYETI, NESNELLIGI VE DISAVURUMU
[ X ]
Tarih
2018
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Türk Felsefe Dernegi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Hem Walter T. Stace hem Steven T. Katz evrensel öze dair birbirlerine zit argümanlarlamistik tecrübe konusunda önemli rol oynarlar. Bu yüzden bu makalede mistik tecrübeninmahiyeti, nesnelligi ve disavurumu onlarin argümanlariyla tartisilmistir. Onlarin mistiktecrübe anlayislarinin oldukça farkli oldugu görülmüstür; dolayisiyla nesnellik problemineyönelik çikarimlari da. Onlar sadece disa vurum konusunda ortak bir düsünceye sahiptirler.Stace mistik tecrübeyi kültürün ötesinde ve dinle iliskisiz bir sekilde tanimlarken,Katz’in mistik tecrübesi din ve kültür araciligiyla asiri belirlenmistir. Bu bulgu makale boyuncadiger felsefi problemleri çözmek için kullanilmistir. Sonuç olarak mistik tecrübedefarkliliklardan ziyade yapisal, yöntemsel ve linguistik benzerlikler olduguna ulasilmistir.
Both Walter T. Stace and Steven T. Katz play an important role as regards the mysticalexperience with their opposite arguments concerning the ‘universal core’. Therefore inthis article the nature, objectivity and expression of mystical experience is discussed throughtheir arguments. It is seen that their understanding of mystical experience is quitedifferent; so is their inference for the problem of objectivity. They only have a commonconsideration as to the issue of expression. Stace defines mystical experience beyond cultureand irrelevant to religion, whereas Katz’s mystical experience is over-determined byreligion and culture. This finding is also used to solve the other philosophical problemsthroughout the article. Consequently it is deduced that there are structural, proceduraland linguistic similarities rather than differences in the mystical experiences.
Both Walter T. Stace and Steven T. Katz play an important role as regards the mysticalexperience with their opposite arguments concerning the ‘universal core’. Therefore inthis article the nature, objectivity and expression of mystical experience is discussed throughtheir arguments. It is seen that their understanding of mystical experience is quitedifferent; so is their inference for the problem of objectivity. They only have a commonconsideration as to the issue of expression. Stace defines mystical experience beyond cultureand irrelevant to religion, whereas Katz’s mystical experience is over-determined byreligion and culture. This finding is also used to solve the other philosophical problemsthroughout the article. Consequently it is deduced that there are structural, proceduraland linguistic similarities rather than differences in the mystical experiences.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Mistik Tecrübe, Mahiyet, Nesnellik, Disavurum, Walter T. Stace, Steven T. Katz
Kaynak
The Philosophy World
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
68
