BILIMSEL TANIMLARIN ÖZELLIKLERI VE ISLEMSELCI TANIMLARA EMPIRIK IÇERIK BAKIMINDAN HEMPEL’IN ELESTIRISI
[ X ]
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Hamdi BRAVO
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bilimsel kavramlar,bilimsel açiklamalarin yapilandirilmasinda temel bir görev üstlenmektedirler.Bilimsel açiklamalarda kavramlari merkez alan en önemli sözcük baglamlarindanbiri tanim tümceleridir. Bu tanimlar, bilimde kavramlarin baslica kullanisözelliklerine göre siniflandirilabilmektedir. Bu siniflandirmada yorumlayicitanim tümcelerinin bir baska yorumu ‘islemselci tanimlari’ Hempel, belli baslinedenlerden ötürü reddetmektedir. Bu çalismada Hempel’e göre bilimseltanimlarin siniflandirilmasinin özellikleri ve islemselci tanimlara özellikleempirik içerik bakimindan Hempel’in yaptigi elestiriler degerlendirilmistir.
Scientific concepts play a fundamental role in structuring scientificexplanations. One of the most important word contexts centered on concepts inscientific explanations are definition sentences. These definitions can beclassified according to the main usage properties of concepts in science. In thisclassification, Hempel rejects ‘operational definitions’ which is anotherinterpretation of the operational definition phrases for certain reasons. Thisstudy evaluates, the features of classification of scientific definitions accordingto Hempel and Hempel's critiques of operational definitions, especially in termsof empirical content. As a result of this assessment, we drew attention theproblems that arose in structuring scientific explanations through operationaldefinitions. Coming up with solutions to these problems addresses to thenecessity of a new theory of understanding in terms of the use of concepts intheory by definition.
Scientific concepts play a fundamental role in structuring scientificexplanations. One of the most important word contexts centered on concepts inscientific explanations are definition sentences. These definitions can beclassified according to the main usage properties of concepts in science. In thisclassification, Hempel rejects ‘operational definitions’ which is anotherinterpretation of the operational definition phrases for certain reasons. Thisstudy evaluates, the features of classification of scientific definitions accordingto Hempel and Hempel's critiques of operational definitions, especially in termsof empirical content. As a result of this assessment, we drew attention theproblems that arose in structuring scientific explanations through operationaldefinitions. Coming up with solutions to these problems addresses to thenecessity of a new theory of understanding in terms of the use of concepts intheory by definition.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bilimsel tanimlar, Islemsel tanimlar, Islemselcilik, Empirik içerik
Kaynak
FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
28
