Comparative analysis of the relationship between bioelectrical impedance analysis results and laboratory data

dc.authoridUsanmaz, Mustafa/0000-0002-5369-2560
dc.contributor.authorErgenc, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorErgenc, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorKaracaer, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Guelsuem
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorUsanmaz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAlkilic, Ersin
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-23T19:25:47Z
dc.date.available2025-03-23T19:25:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentSinop Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim:In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between demographic and laboratory data and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) results in patients <40 and & GE;40 years of age. Material and Methods:This cross-sectional study was conducted at Ayancik State Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, Sinop, Turkey. This study was performed using data derived from the medical files of 674 adult patients (545 females, 129 males) with an average age of 40.15 & PLUSMN; 8.60 years. Results:In patients <40 years of age, there was a moderate relationship between inbody PUM and body fat percentage (r=0.489), inbody PUM and BMI (r=0.626), inbody PUM and fat mass (r=-0.453), BMI and body fat percentage (r=0.489), and BMI and fat mass (r=0.637). In patients aged & GE; 40 years, a strong relationship was noted between fat mass and serum glucose level (r=0.851) and body fat percentage and serum LDL levels (r=0.784). A moderate relationship was observed between fat mass and platelet count (r=0.471), fat mass and BMI (r=0.581), fat mass and body fat percentage (r=0.470), fat mass and inbody PUM (r=-0.494), inbody PUM and body fat percentage (r=-0.670), body fat percentage and fat mass (r=0.510), and body fat percentage and BMI (r=0.503). Discussion:We suggest that BIA may provide important implications for the management of patients with obesity and metabolic disorders.
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/ACAM.21732
dc.identifier.endpage741
dc.identifier.issn2667-663X
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage736
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/ACAM.21732
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11486/4565
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001050540900015
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBayrakol Medical Publisher
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250323
dc.subjectBioelectrical Impedance Analysis
dc.subjectObesity
dc.subjectFat Mass
dc.subjectInflammation
dc.subjectMarker
dc.titleComparative analysis of the relationship between bioelectrical impedance analysis results and laboratory data
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar