Toward Harmonized Black Sea Contaminant Monitoring: Bridging Methods and Assessment

dc.contributor.authorOros, Andra
dc.contributor.authorCoatu, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorOleinik, Yurii
dc.contributor.authorAtabay, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorBat, Levent
dc.contributor.authorMachitadze, Nino
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-25T14:13:25Z
dc.date.available2026-04-25T14:13:25Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentSinop Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe Black Sea is a semi-enclosed basin subject to intense anthropogenic pressures and transboundary pollution, making reliable and comparable monitoring data essential for large-scale environmental assessments. However, national practices differ considerably, hindering data integration and coordinated reporting under international frameworks. This study, conducted within the Horizon 2020 project “Advancing Black Sea Research and Innovation to Co-develop Blue Growth within Resilient Ecosystems” (BRIDGE-BS), evaluated pollutant surveillance methodologies with a focus on heavy metals and priority organic contaminants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides). Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) were collected from institutions across Black Sea countries and systematically compared for water, sediment, and biota matrices. The analysis revealed shared reliance on internationally recognized techniques but also heterogeneity in sediment fraction selection, digestion and extraction conditions, instrumental approaches, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) documentation. To complement this assessment, an intercalibration (IC) exercise was organized through the QUASIMEME proficiency testing scheme, accompanied by a follow-up structured questionnaire sent to participant institutions. While individual results remain confidential, collective feedback highlighted common challenges in calibration, blank correction, certified reference materials (CRMs) availability, digestion variability, instrument maintenance, and the reporting of uncertainty and detection limits. Together, these findings confirm that harmonization in the Black Sea requires not only improved comparability of laboratory methods but also the future alignment of assessment methodologies, including indicators and thresholds, to support coherent, basin-wide environmental evaluations under regional conventions and EU directives. © 2025 by the authors.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Marine Research and Development
dc.description.sponsorshipUkrainian Scientific Centre of Ecology of the Sea
dc.description.sponsorshipNIMRD
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Marine Geology and Geoecology
dc.description.sponsorshipHorizon 2020 Framework Programme, (101000240)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w17213107
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.issue21
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105021399520
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w17213107
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11486/8077
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofWater (Switzerland)
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260420
dc.subjectBlack Sea
dc.subjectcontaminant monitoring
dc.subjectharmonization
dc.subjectheavy metals
dc.subjectorganic pollutants
dc.subjectquality assurance and control
dc.subjectsampling and analytical procedures
dc.titleToward Harmonized Black Sea Contaminant Monitoring: Bridging Methods and Assessment
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar