Maneviyat ve Öznel Iyi Olus Degiskenlerinin Hayatin Anlamini Yordamasi
[ X ]
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Amasya Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Insanin ruhsal olarak saglikli bir yasam sürdürebilmesi için hayatina anlam katabilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Çünkü hayatina anlam katamayan insan, zamanla anlamsizlik duygusuna kapilarak birtakim agir psikolojik sorunlarla karsi karsiya kalabilirken; hayatina anlam katabilen insan ise bu tür sorunlardan daha uzakta bir yasam sürdürebilmektedir. Öte yandan konuyla dogrudan ve dolayli olarak yapilan birtakim saha çalismalarinin sonuçlari, insanlarin kendi hayatlarina anlam kazandirmalarinda ve anlamsizlik duygusundan kurtulmalarinda dini inanç, amaç, sorumluluk gibi bazi faktörlerin olumlu etkilerinin oldugunu; buna karsin depresyon, stres, kaygi, amaç eksikligi gibi diger bazi faktörlerin ise hayatin anlamini olumsuz yönde etkiledigini ortaya koymaktadir. Buradan hareketle, maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenlerinin hayatin anlamlandirilmasinda etkili olup olmadiklarinin; eger etkili ise bu etkinin ne yönde ve düzeyde oldugunun arastirilmasinin önemli oldugu düsünülmektedir.Arastirmanin temel amaci, ilk olarak maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenleri ile hayatin anlami arasinda anlamli bir iliskinin olup olmadigini; eger iliski varsa bu iliskinin ne yönde ve düzeyde oldugunu tespit etmektir. Ikinci olarak ise maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenlerinin hem ayri ayri hem de birlikte hayatin anlami üzerinde yordayici etkilerini arastirmaktir. Böylece konuyla ilgili alan yazinda var oldugu düsünülen boslugun doldurulmasina, konu üzerinde belli genellemelerin yapilabilmesine, degiskenler arasindaki muhtemel iliskilerin sonuçlarina dayanarak birtakim önerilerin sunulmasina ve bu konu çerçevesinde yeni çalismalarin yapilmasina imkân saglanabilir.Arastirma nicel bir nitelige sahiptir ve çalismada iliskisel tarama modeli kullanilmistir. Çalismanin örneklemini, 2018-2019 egitim ögretim yilinda Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi’nin Ilahiyat Fakültesi ile Iletisim Fakültesi’nde ögrenim gören ve tesadüfi yöntemle seçilmis olan toplam 486 ögrenci olusturmaktadir. Verilerin toplanmasinda Manevi Yönelim, Öznel Iyi Olus ile Hayatin Anlam ve Amaci Ölçekleri kullanilmistir. Verilerin analizi, SPSS 20.0 istatistik programi ile yapilmistir. Ölçeklerin güvenirliklerini test etmek için iç tutarlilik katsayisi (Cronbach Alfa) hesaplanmis ve ölçeklerin Cronbach Alfa degerleri (MY=0,87; ÖIO=0,92; HAAÖ=0,84) olarak tespit edilmistir. Arastirmada, bagimli degisken olarak “hayatin anlami”; bagimsiz degiskenler olarak ise “maneviyat” ve “öznel iyi olus” belirlenmistir. Buradan hareketle, maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenlerinin hayatin anlami üzerindeki yordayiciligina ayri ayri bakarken basit regresyon; maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenlerinin birlikte hayatin anlami üzerindeki yordayiciligina bakarken ise çoklu regresyon testi kullanilmistir. Hipotezlerin test edilmesinde hata payi en çok 0,05 olarak kabul edilmistir. Ölçeklerin uygulanmasiyla elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapilan analizler, ögrencilerin maneviyat puanlari ile hayatin anlami puanlari arasinda pozitif yönde ve ortanin alti düzeyde (r=0,364); öznel iyi olus puanlari ile hayatin anlami puanlari arasinda ise pozitif yönde ve ortanin üstü düzeyde anlamli bir korelasyon oldugunu ortaya koymustur (r=0,646). Yine maneviyat ve öznel iyi olus degiskenlerinin hem ayri ayri (maneviyat: R=0,364, R2=0,133, F(1/484)=74,01, p
It is highly important for a person to give meaning to his life in order to live a spiritually healthy life. Because the person who cannot give meaning to his life may face some serious psychological problems by feeling meaningless in course of time; while the person who can give meaning to his life can live a life away from such problems. On the other hand, the results of some direct and indirect field research on the subject show that various factors such as religious belief, purpose and responsibility have positive effects on people who give meaning to their lives and get rid of the sense of meaninglessness, while it indicates that some other factors such as depression, stress, anxiety, lack of purpose have negative affects the meaning of life. Thence, it is considered to be important to investigate whether also spirituality and subjective well-being variables are effective in making sense of life and, if it is effective, what direction and level of this effect. The main purpose of the research is to first determine whether there is a significant relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being variables and the meaning of life and, if there is a relationship, it is to determine what direction and level of this relationship. Secondly, it is to investigate the predictive effects of spirituality and subjective well-being variables on the meaning of life, both separately and together. Thus, it will be possible to fill the gap that is thought to exist in the literature on the topic, to make certain generalizations on the topic, to present some suggestions based on the results of the possible relationships between the variables, and to conduct new studies within the framework of this topic. The research has a quantitative nature and the relational survey model was used in the study. The sample of the study consists of a total of 486 students selected randomly, studying in the Faculty of Theology and the Faculty of Communication at Ondokuz Mayis University during 2018-2019 academic year. Spiritual Orientation, Subjective Well-being and Meaning and Purpose of Life Scales were used for data collection. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. In order to test the reliability of the scales, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) was calculated and the Cronbach's Alpha values of the scales were determined as (SO=0.87; SW=0.92; MPLS=0.84). In the research, “the meaning of life” as the dependent variable, “spirituality” and “subjective well-being” were used as independent variables. So, while simple regression test was used looking separately at the predictor of spirituality and subjective well-being variables on the meaning of life, the multiple regression test was used to examine the predictors of spirituality and subjective well-being together on the meaning of life. The margin of error was accepted as 0.05 at most in testing the hypotheses. The analyzes made on the data obtained by applying the scales indicates that there is a positive and below the middle level significant correlation (r=0.364) between the students' spirituality scores and the meaning of life scores and a positive and above-average significant correlation between subjective well-being scores and meaning of life scores (r=0.646). Thus, it is determined that the variables of spirituality and subjective well-being which are both separately (spirituality: R=0.364, R2=0.133, F(1/484)=74.01, p
It is highly important for a person to give meaning to his life in order to live a spiritually healthy life. Because the person who cannot give meaning to his life may face some serious psychological problems by feeling meaningless in course of time; while the person who can give meaning to his life can live a life away from such problems. On the other hand, the results of some direct and indirect field research on the subject show that various factors such as religious belief, purpose and responsibility have positive effects on people who give meaning to their lives and get rid of the sense of meaninglessness, while it indicates that some other factors such as depression, stress, anxiety, lack of purpose have negative affects the meaning of life. Thence, it is considered to be important to investigate whether also spirituality and subjective well-being variables are effective in making sense of life and, if it is effective, what direction and level of this effect. The main purpose of the research is to first determine whether there is a significant relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being variables and the meaning of life and, if there is a relationship, it is to determine what direction and level of this relationship. Secondly, it is to investigate the predictive effects of spirituality and subjective well-being variables on the meaning of life, both separately and together. Thus, it will be possible to fill the gap that is thought to exist in the literature on the topic, to make certain generalizations on the topic, to present some suggestions based on the results of the possible relationships between the variables, and to conduct new studies within the framework of this topic. The research has a quantitative nature and the relational survey model was used in the study. The sample of the study consists of a total of 486 students selected randomly, studying in the Faculty of Theology and the Faculty of Communication at Ondokuz Mayis University during 2018-2019 academic year. Spiritual Orientation, Subjective Well-being and Meaning and Purpose of Life Scales were used for data collection. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. In order to test the reliability of the scales, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha) was calculated and the Cronbach's Alpha values of the scales were determined as (SO=0.87; SW=0.92; MPLS=0.84). In the research, “the meaning of life” as the dependent variable, “spirituality” and “subjective well-being” were used as independent variables. So, while simple regression test was used looking separately at the predictor of spirituality and subjective well-being variables on the meaning of life, the multiple regression test was used to examine the predictors of spirituality and subjective well-being together on the meaning of life. The margin of error was accepted as 0.05 at most in testing the hypotheses. The analyzes made on the data obtained by applying the scales indicates that there is a positive and below the middle level significant correlation (r=0.364) between the students' spirituality scores and the meaning of life scores and a positive and above-average significant correlation between subjective well-being scores and meaning of life scores (r=0.646). Thus, it is determined that the variables of spirituality and subjective well-being which are both separately (spirituality: R=0.364, R2=0.133, F(1/484)=74.01, p
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Din Psikolojisi, Maneviyat, Öznel Iyi Olus, Hayatin Anlami
Kaynak
Amasya Ilahiyat Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
17
