ZIYA GÖKALP VE YUSUF AKÇURA’DA MILLET TASAVVURUNUN ONTOLOJIK TEMELLERI
[ X ]
Tarih
2018
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Hakan YALAP
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Modern çagin en önemli politik nesneleri olan milletler, çözümlenmesi zor bir ontoloji barindirirlar. Çünkü milletlerin üzerinde temellendigi ontolojik zemin, fazlasiyla özneldir. Daha açik bir ifadeyle her bir millet, farkli milli kimlik kodlamalariyla biçimlenmistir. Belirli bir milli aidiyete mensup bireylerin, milli kimligi kavrayis biçimleri bile farklilik gösterebilir. Bu baglamda Türk milliyetçiligi üzerine bir çalisma, homojen bir düsünce yapisini incelemeyi mümkün kilmaz gibidir. Her ne kadar söylem olarak tek bir Türk milliyetçiliginden söz edilebilirse de aslinda bu düsünce altinda birbirinden çok farkli fraksiyonlarin varligi söz konusudur. Bu fraksiyonlarin temel ayrim noktasini ise Türk milli kimliginin hangi “ontolojik” temel üzerine insa edilecegi olusturur. Türkiye’de milliyetçilik konusunda olusan bu farkli ontolojik kabullerin temelleri ise büyük ölçüde Ziya Gökalp ve Yusuf Akçura tarafindan atilmistir. Bu çalisma Türk milliyetçiliginin bu iki önemli ideologunun, Türk milli kimliginin ontolojisinde neyi konumlandirdiklari üzerine bir karsilastirmaya dayanmaktadir
Nations, the most important political objects of the modern era, have a difficult ontology to solve. Because the ontological ground on which nations are based is highly subjective. More clearly, each nation is shaped by different national identity constituents. Even the individuals whom belonging to a particular national identity, the conception of nation can be different. In this context, it is impossible for a study on Turkish nationalism to examine the structure of a homogeneous thought. Although a single Turkish nationalism can be mentioned as a rhetoric, the existence of very different fractions is under discussion. The basic distinction of these fractions is on which "ontological" foundation the Turkish national identity is based on. If these different ontological assumptions made about the foundations of nationalism in Turkey is largely laid by Ziya Gokalp and Yusuf Akçura. This study is based on a comparison of what these two important ideologists of Turkish nationalism place in the ontology of the Turkish national identity
Nations, the most important political objects of the modern era, have a difficult ontology to solve. Because the ontological ground on which nations are based is highly subjective. More clearly, each nation is shaped by different national identity constituents. Even the individuals whom belonging to a particular national identity, the conception of nation can be different. In this context, it is impossible for a study on Turkish nationalism to examine the structure of a homogeneous thought. Although a single Turkish nationalism can be mentioned as a rhetoric, the existence of very different fractions is under discussion. The basic distinction of these fractions is on which "ontological" foundation the Turkish national identity is based on. If these different ontological assumptions made about the foundations of nationalism in Turkey is largely laid by Ziya Gokalp and Yusuf Akçura. This study is based on a comparison of what these two important ideologists of Turkish nationalism place in the ontology of the Turkish national identity
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Millet, Milli Kimlik, Türk Milliyetçiligi, Ziya Gökalp, Yusuf Akçura
Kaynak
The Journal of International Civilization Studies
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
3
Sayı
1
