Yazar "Yolcu, Irem" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    2016-2020 Yillari Arasinda Yazilmis Ortodonti Uzmanlik ve Doktora Tezlerinin Yayinlanma Oranlarinin Incelenmesi
    (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, 2022) Özkalayci, Nurhat; Yolcu, Irem; Töz, Melis; Çiçek, Orhan
    Dis hekimliginde lisansüstü uzmanlik ve doktora tezleri, birçok bilimsel adimdan ilkidir. Ülkemizde dis hekimliginde uzmanlik ve doktoraegitimlerini bitirebilmek için tez yazmak ve yazilan tezi savunmak zorunludur. Tezlerin yayinlanmasi ise, yeni bilginin bilim camiasindayayilmasini saglar. Çalismamizda 2016-2020 yillari arasinda yazilan, merkezi sinav ile alinan 377 dis hekimligi uzmanlik ögrencisi ileüniversitelerin kendi bünyelerinde yaptiklari sinav ile alinan 149 doktora ögrencisinin tezleri incelenmistir. Degerlendirilen tezlerin teslimtarihleri, arastirma tipleri, danisman ögretim üyelerinin unvanlari, yapildigi üniversiteler, çalismalarin konulari ve yayinlanma durumlarikaydedildi. Tezlerin yayin durumu, Pubmed ve Google Akademik arama motorlari kullanilarak ve Dergi Park üzerinden yazar adi,danisman adi, tez basliklari Türkçe ve Ingilizce taranarak degerlendirildi. IBM SPSS 26.0 programi kullanilarak Ki-kare istatistiksel analiziyapildi. Yayinlanan tezler dergi kapsamina göre SCIE/ ESCI indeksli dergiler, diger ulusal dergiler ve diger uluslararasi dergiler seklindeincelenerek yayinlanma oranlari yüzdelik oran olarak hesaplandi. %71,67’si uzmanlik tezi ve % 28,32’si doktora tezi olan toplam 526 tezinyayinlanma oranlarinin doktora tezlerinde % 26,17 iken, uzmanlik tezlerinde ise % 17,5 oldugu görüldü.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Evaluation of Facial Aesthetics In Young-Adult Turkish Society
    (Gazi Üniversitesi, 2024) Yolcu, Irem; Çiçek, Orhan; Özkalayci, Nurhat
    OBJECTIVE: In the study; it is aimed to obtain soft tissue parameters of young adult individuals, which are liked by the society, instead of the concept of normal used in the orthodontic literature, which can help diagnosis and treatment planning.MATERIALS AND METHOD: In the study; profile and frontal photographs of 88 women and 61 men, aged between 20-31, who had no facial asymmetry and no trauma history, were used. Profile and frontal photographs of the participants were turned into a survey via Google forms; it was presented to the panel that included 4 orthodontists, 4 dentists, 4 plastic surgeons, 4 architects and 4 non-professional individuals. Panelists were asked to rate the photographs on a scale of 1-10. As a result of scoring; while 13 individuals with 7 points or more formed the attractive group, 13 individuals with 3 points or less formed the unattractive group. Angular measurements, vertical and horizontal distances were measured and compared to each other on 26 individuals. According to the scoring results, male individuals were excluded from the study because the number of males constituting the attractive group was insufficient. Normal distribution of data was evaluated statistically by Shapiro-Wilk test, and inter-group comparison was evaluated using Mann Whitney U-test (p<0.05).RESULTS: As a result of the frontal analysis; while the ratios of face width to face height, alar wing width to nasal height and bigonial width to mouth width were statistically higher in attractive individuals; the ratio of intercanthal width to facial width was found to be lower (p<0.05). As a result of profile analysis; while total vertical angle, nasal angle, middle and lower facial triad angles were found to be statistically lower in attractive individuals; facial convexity angle was higher (p<0.05).CONCLUSION: Vertical growth pattern of the face, nasal tip position, facial convexity and harmony in the vertical and transversal ratios of the face are among the factors that determine facial attractiveness in women.