Amin, Mina A.Diker, HalideSahin, OnurVarlikli, CananSoliman, Ahmed A.2026-04-252026-04-2520250022-28601872-8014https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.142763https://hdl.handle.net/11486/8292Two octahedral nickel complexes; [Ni(fdtp)2(DMF)2] (1) and [Ni(dcdtp)2(DMF)2] (2), based on 4-((3-fluorophenyl)diazenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-ol (fdtp) and 4-((2,4-dichlorophenyl)diazenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-ol (dcdtp) were synthesized. The complexes were characterized spectroscopically (FTIR, UV-Vis, Photoluminescence), Mass spectrometry, elemental analyses, electrochemically, thermally, and through Single-crystal X-ray investigations. The formation of the complexes was confirmed by the existence of Ni-O and Ni-N vibrations at bonds were observed as weak bands at 526-497 and 470-438 cm-1. According to the thermogravimetric analyses, the complexes were thermally stable and had relatively high activation energies (585.81 and 730.07 kJ mol-1 for 1, and 2, respectively). Cyclic voltammograms showed that the anodic potential region of 1 and 2 exhibited two irreversible oxidation peaks at 1.34 V &1.55 V and 1.41 V & 1.63 V, respectively, attributed to metal-localized oxidation. The complexes showed enhanced antibacterial activities compared to free ligands and comparable to the standard. The inhibition zones exhibited via 1 were about 21.7, 19.3, and 26.7 mm versus Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. Aureus), and Bacillus Subtits (B. Subtits), respectively. Docking studies supported the antibacterial investigations; the binding energies of the complexes were -8.81 and -9.69 kcal/mol for 1 and 2 respectively, against E. coli (PDB ID: 6F86).eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessNickel(II) complexesPyrazole-based ligandDFTDockingAntibacterial activitiesArticle134210.1016/j.molstruc.2025.1427632-s2.0-105005766475Q1WOS:001501915000006Q20000-0002-1410-60550000-0003-3765-32350000-0002-8805-8009