Mert, Rabia2025-03-232025-03-2320243023-65843023-6649https://hdl.handle.net/11486/2313In this work, Byung-Chul Han tries to explain his own belief to people in the West and aims to show the philosophical power of Zen Buddhism, despite its recognition as an art of living. It is important that Zen Buddhism is based on practice and that it meets a need, considering that awareness experiences are not adequately conveyed linguistically. The author creates a framework around the topics of religion without God, emptiness, no one, living in nothingness, death and friendship, and compares Zen Buddhism with the philosophies of Plato, Leibniz, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzshe and Heidegger. Han explains that in Zen Buddhism, both affirmation and negation of life are combined and that it is not based on any ultimate purpose or reason, and explains this with the doctrine of emptiness. At this point, he also includes some issues that he thinks have been influenced by Zen Buddhism in Western thought, such as emptiness and the phenomenology of ordinary life. In this work, the author describes Zen Buddhism from a philosophical perspective, but at the same time does not mention that it is a religious sect. In a way, this causes Zen Buddhism to be incompletely understood.Byung-Chul Han, bu eserinde Bati’daki insanlara kendi inancini anlatma çabasinda olup, Zen Budizm’in bir yasama sanati olarak taninmasina karsin onun felsefi gücünü göstermeyi amaçlamaktadir. Zen Budizm’in pratige dayali olmasi ve farkindalik deneyimlerinin dilsel olarak yeterli düzeyde aktarilmadigi düsünüldügünde bir ihtiyaca karsilik olusturmasi bakimindan önemlidir. Yazar, Tanrisiz din, bosluk, hiç kimse, hiçlikte yasamak, ölüm ve dostluk basliklari üzerinden bir çerçeve olusturmakta ve Platon, Leibniz, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzshe ve Heidegger felsefeleri ile Zen Budizm’i karsilastirmaktadir. Han, Zen Budizm’de hayati hem olumlama hem olumsuzlamanin birlestirildigini, herhangi bir nihai amaç veya sebebe dayanmadigini anlatmakta bunu da bosluk ögretisi ile açiklamaktadir. Bu noktada bosluk ve siradan yasamin fenomenolojisi gibi Zen Budizm’den Bati düsüncesinin etkilendigini düsündügü bazi hususlara da yer vermektedir. Yazar, bu eserinde felsefi bir bakis açisiyla Zen Budizm’i anlatirken ayni zamanda onun dini bir mezhep oldugundan bahsetmemektedir. Bu da bir bakima Zen Budizm’in eksik anlasilmasina neden olmaktadir.trinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHistory of ReligionsEmptinessNothingnessPhenomenology of Ordinary LifeBook Review226582